Important perspective expressed by Michael
Scherer in Time Magazine on Boston and Chicago mayors' attempts to deny Chick-fil-A a business license in their respective cities because Dan
Cathy, the CEO of Chick-fil-A, said he supports traditional marriage.
“Generally speaking,” Scherer writes, “governments have a responsibility to not
discriminate against businesses on the basis of personal beliefs, just as
restaurant chains cannot discriminate against employees on the basis of
personal beliefs (or sexual orientation).”
When government officials begin denying business owners the
right to open a business in their cities because they supposedly don’t reflect their
city’s values, as Rahm Emmanuel (Chicago mayor) and Thomas Menino (Boston
mayor) have said, we’ve moved dangerously away from one of America’s most treasured
liberties—the right to express one’s views without government repercussion.
I like what Dennis Prager had to say the other day, commenting on the
matter: “If you love freedom, buy
Chick-fil-A. Even if you support gay marriage, buy Chick-fil-A. Even if you’re a vegetarian, buy Chick-fil-A (you can always give your
sandwich to a homeless person, if you don’t want to eat it).”
Prager is right. This issue isn’t about whether you agree or disagree with Dan Cathy's views. It’s about preserving our Constitutionally-protected, fundamental right to free speech. This should trump any disagreement over gay marriage.
Scherer concludes his article by writing, “Presumably, many business owners in both states are among those who oppose same-sex marriage. Should those businessmen and women worry that their hopes for city permits or mayoral cooperation could be jeopardized if they express their opinions publicly?”
Prager is right. This issue isn’t about whether you agree or disagree with Dan Cathy's views. It’s about preserving our Constitutionally-protected, fundamental right to free speech. This should trump any disagreement over gay marriage.
Scherer concludes his article by writing, “Presumably, many business owners in both states are among those who oppose same-sex marriage. Should those businessmen and women worry that their hopes for city permits or mayoral cooperation could be jeopardized if they express their opinions publicly?”
Answer? Absolutely not. This is America, for heaven's sake. There’s a time-honored approach to expressing
your disagreement with a company over its stated values—it’s called boycott. If you don't agree with Cathy, fine. Don't buy his product! However, that's not what's at issue here. Now is not the time to
boycott Chick-fil-A. Now is the time to stand with this company in solidarity over
the right to speak your mind freely and openly without government
oppression.
"Chick-fil-A Meets a First Amendment Buzzsaw in Chicago" (Michael Scherer, Time)
A whole new wave of people are boycotting them now. Will the Chic-Fil-A investors appreciate the loss's?
ReplyDelete